Technology

Multi-agent intelligence.Specialists, each with one job.

Instead of one general-purpose assistant doing everything, Codira coordinates agents with defined responsibilities, so planning, writing, reviewing and checking are done by different specialists that can disagree with one another.

Agent handoffs0 of 6

A single assistant that plans, writes and reviews its own work has no second opinion. The reviewer shares the writer's blind spots because it is the writer. Giving each responsibility to a separate agent, with its own instructions and its own definition of done, creates the independence that review depends on.

Codira's agents work inside the orchestration layer rather than talking freely among themselves. Each one's output can inform, constrain or start the next agent's work, and a reviewer can send work back. The roles differ by profession, because a security review of code and a compliance screen of a press release are different jobs.

The roles.Responsibilities that benefit from separation.

Planning

Interprets the objective and lays out the work before anything is written.

Implementation

Produces the change, draft or analysis the plan calls for, as a proposal.

Review

Reads what was produced with fresh instructions, and can return it.

Security

Looks specifically for vulnerabilities and risks, separate from general review.

Quality Assurance

Checks tests, edge cases and completeness against the request.

Auditing

Examines existing work as a whole, beyond the change in front of it.

Verification

Confirms what actually happened, from real output rather than the agents' own accounts.

Domain Specialists

Roles that exist only in one profession, such as compliance screening or contradiction finding.

Coordination

The orchestration layer, not the agents, decides who works when and on what.

Why coordination matters.Uncoordinated agents multiply errors.

More agents are not automatically better. Without coordination they duplicate work, contradict one another and pass a mistake from one task to the next.

Codira's agents operate within defined responsibilities and controls, with checkpoints between them, so a failure in one task is contained rather than inherited by every task after it.

The aim is not more agents. It is specialists that collaborate well.

One failure, two architectures

What it does not do.Specialists propose. People decide.

Multiple agents improve coverage and independence. They do not replace accountable people.

  • Agents reviewing each other's work can still share a mistake; that is why rules in code and people check too.

  • No agent in Codira's products can publish, pay, send, apply or accept on its own authority.

  • Agent counts are not a measure of quality, and the right roles vary by profession.

The rest of the architecture.Explore the other capabilities.

Specialized intelligenceinside a coordinated system.

The value is not in the number of agents but in clear responsibilities, real independence and an architecture that keeps them in order.